24/10/2009
undermines the Lord himself and his party, which in total is not much I care. But the care that primarily harms the Lord to the public. By such behavior as the Lord's people are moving away from politics, and so really from democracy and civil society. Pan reinforces their belief that life is governed by kolesiostwo, nepotism, and cunning.
From Wednesday, we published an article about the region that the board accepted the application form signed by your wife, in statements to journalists shakes you, as it can.
First, there really is not any great contribution, because the estimate could still change, the wife tries to only about 37 percent. financing and can get a 200, up 300 thousand. zł. Probably yes, but that these are only your words, so far no new estimate your wife has not made and the value of investment securities is 1 million 315 thousand. zł.
Secondly, tells you that this laundry is a great deal for that part of the province, because, for example Raspberry Zdrój hotel must ride the horse Solca to Krakow. And this is not true - yes, he takes money, but not to Krakow, just to Busk. Mr. laundry, so creating nine new jobs in Solec-Zdroj, it may take as much or more positions in a distant 20 kilometers Busko, in the same county. So what is a great deal for the region?
Thirdly, the Lord uses the argument: "And, wife of politics has to sit at home?". Except that his wife lent to this argument does not match nohow. Your wife for many years working in a bank, not sitting at home, so it is not so incapacitated, as might be due with your statements.
In an interview with me, you said that "the game was fair." But how to explain it to 300 operators who took part in the same competition, and have not received a grant? Most of them, as opposed to the Lord and his wife, the business is already established, and indeed, in accordance with name of the contest, wants to "increase the competitiveness" of their companies, not to build a business from scratch. How do they have to believe in fair play, since the evaluation of projects is very vague and evaluative.
Request your wife scored 57 points out of 100, minimum, to get on the list, it is 56.5. I looked through this project. I also saw the appeal two businessmen who did not get the grant, and answers to no authority. I daresay that a few, maybe even 10 points could be, judging by the project, quietly "pull" in one way or the other, giving a head start, or underestimating the result.
repeat once again - please not to appoint a new frontier of decency in our public life and to draw conclusions from what happened this week.
0 comments:
Post a Comment