cops for everything you need instructions, standards and guidelines? To open canned too? This week, we described how, after the article "Newspapers" Deputy Interior Minister explained to police that when the breathalyzer shows 0.00, then the driver is sober. case was bizarre. For our editorial team reported to the driver, who for three weeks lost the license because the police stopped it to him. The document drew him before the court, on the occasion of burdening taxpayers to pay an expert. The expert, expert from the automotive and test concentrations of alcohol and its effects on ability to drive, sober described in his opinion that "zero" is a "zero". I pocketed you 200 zł.O what is it? Breathalyzer does not examine the blood alcohol level, which is the basis for the punishment of drivers, but the concentration of alcohol in the air. Sometimes it is said "the breath", but it is not quite true, because the device can react to even the fumes from spray glazing. If you wash out your mouth so the driver liquid containing alcohol (Listerine, for example, to clean the mouth), and immediately be examined breathalyzer, mindless machine will show the alleged blood alcohol offenses falling under the Code. Of course, just before the test, rinse mouth with water and wait 15 minutes and the breathalyser shows the truth, which is 0.00 mg. They know about it and describe exactly what the producers of these devices. However, for our police breathalyzer guide is not a sufficient document. I began to be addressed to the courts of drivers who were sober, because the officer was "vague" that the first breathalyzer showed the equivalent of 0.3 per mille in the blood, and after 15 minutes 0.00. It's as complicated a situation that occurred the Police Headquarters until the Institute of Forensic Research in Krakow, so that the developed procedures of how to proceed in such cases. And This same institute over a year now the police can not question dosłać.Mogę standards to guess why. Because how can you scientifically, professionally and at the same time, without exposing themselves to ridicule, to describe such an obvious case? Fortunately, we have MPs and officials. Following our article Mr Arthur PO Gierada wrote interpellation, to which he replied Deputy Interior Minister Adam Rapacki. And Deputy Minister on three sides wrote exactly what he says and thinks any reasonable driver - in such situations to retain the license is excessive zeal. Dear policemen. I really do not need to have all manuals and standards action. Sometimes it is enough to think about. Source: Gazeta Wyborcza Kielce
0 comments:
Post a Comment